Hyundai i30 2017 vs Hyundai Kona 2017
| Body: | Hatchback | Crossover / SUV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 120 HP | 120 HP | |
| Torque: | 171 NM | 172 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.3 seconds | 12 seconds | |
| Hyundai i30 and Hyundai Kona have the same engine power, but Hyundai i30 torque is 1 NM less than Hyundai Kona. Hyundai i30 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.5 | 5.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.4 l/100km | 6.5 l/100km | |
|
The Hyundai i30 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Hyundai i30 consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai Kona, which means that by driving the Hyundai i30 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 120 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Hyundai i30 consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai Kona. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 40 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1110 km in combined cycle | 750 km in combined cycle | |
| 780 km with real consumption | 610 km with real consumption | ||
| Hyundai i30 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 135 mm (5.3 inches) | 170 mm (6.7 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Hyundai Kona can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Hyundai Kona version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. Choose from three 4x4 versions of Hyundai Kona 2017 if off-road driveability is important to you. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 300'000 km | 300'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 10 years | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.34 m | 4.17 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.55 m | |
| Hyundai i30 is 18 cm longer than the Hyundai Kona, width is practically the same , while the height of Hyundai i30 is 10 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 395 litres | 361 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1301 litres | 1143 litres | |
|
Hyundai i30 has more luggage capacity. Hyundai i30 has 34 litres more trunk space than the Hyundai Kona. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Hyundai i30 (by 158 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`800 | no data | |
| Safety: | |||
| The Hyundai i30 scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 14 200 | 17 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Hyundai i30 has
|
Hyundai Kona has
| |