Hyundai i30 2012 vs Hyundai ix35 2009
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Estate car / wagon | Crossover / SUV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Hyundai i30 is available only with front wheel drive, while Hyundai ix35 can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. | |||
| Engines: | 1.4 - 1.6 | 1.6 - 2.4 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 - 135 HP | 115 - 184 HP | |
| Torque: | 137 - 260 NM | 164 - 383 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 - 13.5 seconds | 9.4 - 12.4 seconds | |
| In general, Hyundai ix35 are available with more powerful and dynamic engines than Hyundai i30. Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.1 - 6.9 | 5.2 - 9.2 | |
|
Hyundai i30 petrol engines consumes on average 1.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than Hyundai ix35. On average, Hyundai i30 equipped with diesel engines consume 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai ix35. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.50 m | 4.41 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.49 m | 1.67 m | |
| Hyundai i30 is 9 cm longer than the Hyundai ix35, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Hyundai i30 is 18 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 528 litres | 591 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1642 litres | 1436 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Hyundai i30 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Hyundai i30 (by 206 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Hyundai i30 is 0.2 metres less than that of the Hyundai ix35. | |||
| Gross weight: | ~ 1`879 kg | ~ 2`044 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 1`271 kg | ~ 1`498 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 608 kg | ~ 546 kg | |
| Hyundai i30 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 10 procentiem more than Hyundai ix35. Therefore, Hyundai i30 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | |||
| The Hyundai i30 scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | below average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 5000 | 6400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Hyundai i30 has
|
Hyundai ix35 has
| |