Hyundai i30 2010 vs Skoda Rapid 2012

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Hyundai i30
2010 - 2012
Skoda Rapid
2012 - 2017
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 1.4 - 1.61.2 - 1.6

Performance

Power: 90 - 126 HP75 - 122 HP
Torque: 137 - 260 NM112 - 250 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 11 - 14.9 seconds9.5 - 13.9 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.4 - 6.93.6 - 5.9
Hyundai i30 petrol engines consumes on average 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Skoda Rapid. On average, Hyundai i30 equipped with diesel engines consume 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Rapid.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 4.28 m4.48 m
Width: 1.78 m1.71 m
Height: 1.48 m1.46 m
Hyundai i30 is 20 cm shorter than the Skoda Rapid, 7 cm wider, while the height of Hyundai i30 is 2 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 340 litres550 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1250 litres1490 litres
Skoda Rapid has more luggage space.
Hyundai i30 has 210 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Rapid. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Rapid (by 240 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.2 meters10.9 meters
The turning circle of the Hyundai i30 is 0.7 metres less than that of the Skoda Rapid, which means Hyundai i30 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`777~ 1`667
Safety: no data
Quality:
below average

below average
Average price (€): 34007000
Pros and Cons: Hyundai i30 has
  • better manoeuvrability
  • lower price
Skoda Rapid has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • roomier boot
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv