Hyundai i30 2010 vs Mazda 3 2013
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.4 - 1.6 | 1.5 - 2.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 - 126 HP | 100 - 187 HP | |
| Torque: | 137 - 260 NM | 144 - 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11 - 14.9 seconds | 8.1 - 13.6 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.4 - 6.9 | 4.1 - 7.6 | |
|
Hyundai i30 petrol engines consumes on average 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mazda 3. On average, Hyundai i30 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 3. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.28 m | 4.47 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.45 m | |
|
Hyundai i30 is smaller, but slightly higher. Hyundai i30 is 19 cm shorter than the Mazda 3, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Hyundai i30 is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 340 litres | 364 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1250 litres | 1263 litres | |
|
Mazda 3 has more luggage space. Hyundai i30 has 24 litres less trunk space than the Mazda 3. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda 3 (by 13 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Hyundai i30 is 0.4 metres less than that of the Mazda 3, which means Hyundai i30 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`777 | ~ 1`864 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 3400 | 7800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Hyundai i30 has
|
Mazda 3 has
| |