Hyundai i30 2019 vs Skoda Rapid 2017
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.0 - 2.0 | 1.0 - 1.6 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 95 - 275 HP | 90 - 125 HP | |
| Torque: | 134 - 353 NM | 160 - 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.5 - 12.6 seconds | 8.9 - 11.7 seconds | |
| In general, Hyundai i30 are available with more powerful and dynamic engines than Skoda Rapid. Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.9 - 7.8 | 4.0 - 4.8 | |
|
Hyundai i30 petrol engines consumes on average 1.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than Skoda Rapid. On average, Hyundai i30 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Rapid. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.34 m | 4.30 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.71 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.46 m | |
|
Hyundai i30 is larger, but slightly lower. Hyundai i30 is 3 cm longer than the Skoda Rapid, 9 cm wider, while the height of Hyundai i30 is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 395 litres | 415 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1301 litres | 1490 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Hyundai i30 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Rapid (by 189 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.9 meters | |
| Gross weight: | ~ 1`872 kg | ~ 1`684 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 1`306 kg | ~ 1`229 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 566 kg | ~ 455 kg | |
| Hyundai i30 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 20 procentiem more than Skoda Rapid. Therefore, Hyundai i30 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 7200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Hyundai i30 has
|
Skoda Rapid has
| |