Hyundai i30 2016 vs Hyundai Kona 2017
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Hatchback | Crossover / SUV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Hyundai i30 is available only with front wheel drive, while Hyundai Kona can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. | |||
| Engines: | 1.0 - 2.0 | 1.0 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 100 - 275 HP | 43 - 177 HP | |
| Torque: | 134 - 353 NM | 147 - 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.1 - 12.7 seconds | 7.9 - 12 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.4 - 5.2 | 3.9 - 7.3 | |
|
Hyundai i30 petrol engines consumes on average 1.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than Hyundai Kona. On average, Hyundai i30 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai Kona. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Ground clearance: | 135 - 140 mm (5.3 - 5.5 inches) | 170 - 177 mm (6.7 - 7 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Hyundai Kona can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.34 m | 4.17 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.55 m | |
| Hyundai i30 is 18 cm longer than the Hyundai Kona, width is practically the same , while the height of Hyundai i30 is 10 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 395 litres | 544 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1301 litres | 1297 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Hyundai i30 has 149 litres less trunk space than the Hyundai Kona. This could mean that the Hyundai i30 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Hyundai i30 (by 4 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Hyundai i30 is 1 metres more than that of the Hyundai Kona, which means Hyundai i30 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`865 | ~ 1`879 | |
| Safety: | |||
| The Hyundai i30 scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 14 200 | 17 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Hyundai i30 has
|
Hyundai Kona has
| |