Hyundai i20 2009 vs Mazda 2 2008
Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 100 HP | 103 HP | |
Torque: | n/a NM | 137 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.9 seconds | 10.4 seconds | |
Mazda 2 is a more dynamic driving. Hyundai i20 engine produces 3 HP less power than Mazda 2. Due to the lower power, Hyundai i20 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.2 | 5.9 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 8.2 l/100km | 7.0 l/100km | |
The Mazda 2 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Hyundai i20 consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 2, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Hyundai i20 could require 45 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Hyundai i20 consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 2. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 43 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 720 km in combined cycle | 720 km in combined cycle | |
880 km on highway | 870 km on highway | ||
540 km with real consumption | 610 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 3.94 m | 3.90 m | |
Width: | 1.71 m | 1.70 m | |
Height: | 1.49 m | 1.48 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Hyundai i20 is 4 cm longer than the Mazda 2, 1 cm wider, while the height of Hyundai i20 is 1 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 250 litres | |
Turning diameter: | no data | 9.8 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`485 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | below average | average | |
Mazda 2 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Hyundai i20 has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Mazda 2, so Mazda 2 quality is probably better | |||
Average price (€): | 2000 | 2400 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Hyundai i20 has
|
Mazda 2 has
| |