Hyundai i20 2009 vs Mitsubishi Colt 2008
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.3 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 78 HP | 95 HP | |
| Torque: | n/a NM | 125 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.9 seconds | 11 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Colt is a more dynamic driving. Hyundai i20 engine produces 17 HP less power than Mitsubishi Colt. Due to the lower power, Hyundai i20 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.2 | 5.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.3 l/100km | 6.5 l/100km | |
|
The Hyundai i20 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Hyundai i20 consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Colt, which means that by driving the Hyundai i20 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Hyundai i20 consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Colt. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 47 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 860 km in combined cycle | 810 km in combined cycle | |
| 1000 km on highway | 970 km on highway | ||
| 710 km with real consumption | 720 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Mitsubishi Colt 2008 1.3 engine: The Mitsubishi 4A90 is a 1.3-liter aluminum four-cylinder engine with a timing chain, used mainly in compact Mitsubishi models. It is a simple and lightweight unit designed with fuel economy in mind, but over time several characteristic weaknesses tend ... More about Mitsubishi Colt 2008 1.3 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.94 m | 3.88 m | |
| Width: | 1.71 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.49 m | 1.52 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Hyundai i20 is 6 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Colt, 2 cm wider, while the height of Hyundai i20 is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 220 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.8 meters | |
| Gross weight: | no data | 1`430 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | above average | |
| Mitsubishi Colt has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Hyundai i20 has serious deffects in 40 percent more cases than Mitsubishi Colt, so Mitsubishi Colt quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1800 | 2200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Hyundai i20 has
|
Mitsubishi Colt has
| |