Hyundai i20 2009 vs Hyundai Getz 2005
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 100 HP | 97 HP | |
| Torque: | 137 NM | 125 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.9 seconds | 13.9 seconds | |
|
Hyundai i20 is more dynamic to drive. Hyundai i20 engine produces 3 HP more power than Hyundai Getz, whereas torque is 12 NM more than Hyundai Getz. Thanks to more power Hyundai i20 reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.2 | 6.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.1 l/100km | 7.8 l/100km | |
|
By specification Hyundai i20 consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai Getz, which means that by driving the Hyundai i20 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Hyundai i20 consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai Getz. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 720 km in combined cycle | 680 km in combined cycle | |
| 880 km on highway | 860 km on highway | ||
| 550 km with real consumption | 570 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 19 years | 7 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Kia Ceed, Hyundai i30, Hyundai Accent, Kia RIO | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Hyundai Accent, Kia RIO | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Hyundai i20 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Hyundai Getz engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Hyundai i20 2009 1.4 engine: This engine is generally reliable and rarely causes issues.
One of its major concerns is cylinder wall scoring. Early versions were equipped with a large exhaust manifold, but around 2010, it was replaced with a compact catalytic manifold. If the catalytic ... More about Hyundai i20 2009 1.4 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.94 m | 3.82 m | |
| Width: | 1.71 m | 1.66 m | |
| Height: | 1.49 m | 1.49 m | |
|
Hyundai i20 is larger. Hyundai i20 is 12 cm longer than the Hyundai Getz, 5 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 295 litres | 254 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1060 litres | 977 litres | |
|
Hyundai i20 has more luggage capacity. Hyundai i20 has 41 litres more trunk space than the Hyundai Getz. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Hyundai i20 (by 83 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Hyundai i20 is 0.4 metres more than that of the Hyundai Getz, which means Hyundai i20 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`565 | 1`420 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | Hyundai i20 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Hyundai Getz has serious deffects in 35 percent more cases than Hyundai i20, so Hyundai i20 quality is probably significantly better | ||
| Average price (€): | 3200 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Hyundai i20 has
|
Hyundai Getz has
| |