Hyundai i20 2014 vs Renault Clio 2012
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 0.9 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 122 NM | 135 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.6 seconds | 11.8 seconds | |
|
Renault Clio is a more dynamic driving. Hyundai i20 engine produces 15 HP less power than Renault Clio, whereas torque is 13 NM less than Renault Clio. Due to the lower power, Hyundai i20 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.7 | 4.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.0 l/100km | 6.3 l/100km | |
|
By specification Hyundai i20 consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Clio, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Hyundai i20 could require 60 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Hyundai i20 consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Clio. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 40 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1060 km in combined cycle | 930 km in combined cycle | |
| 1250 km on highway | 1080 km on highway | ||
| 830 km with real consumption | 630 km with real consumption | ||
| Hyundai i20 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.04 m | 4.06 m | |
| Width: | 1.73 m | 1.73 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.45 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Hyundai i20 is 3 cm shorter than the Renault Clio, width is practically the same , while the height of Hyundai i20 is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 326 litres | 300 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1042 litres | no data | |
|
Hyundai i20 has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Hyundai i20 has 26 litres more trunk space than the Renault Clio. The Renault Clio may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Hyundai i20 is 0.4 metres less than that of the Renault Clio, which means Hyundai i20 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`580 | 1`588 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Renault Clio scores higher in safety tests. The Renault Clio scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | average | below average | |
| Hyundai i20 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Clio has serious deffects in 25 percent more cases than Hyundai i20, so Hyundai i20 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 6000 | 9800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Hyundai i20 has
|
Renault Clio has
| |