Hyundai i20 2014 vs Renault Clio 2012
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.1 Diesel | 1.5 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 180 NM | 200 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 16 seconds | 12.1 seconds | |
|
Renault Clio is a more dynamic driving. Hyundai i20 engine produces 15 HP less power than Renault Clio, whereas torque is 20 NM less than Renault Clio. Due to the lower power, Hyundai i20 reaches 100 km/h speed 3.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.2 | 3.2 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1560 km in combined cycle | 1400 km in combined cycle | |
| 1660 km on highway | 1500 km on highway | ||
| 1040 km with real consumption | 930 km with real consumption | ||
| Hyundai i20 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 14 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 22 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Dacia Duster, Nissan Juke | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Renault Clio 2012 1.5 engine: The engine has many modifications, is sufficiently common and spare parts are available. The fuel consumption/power ratio is good. The fuel injection system can be a problem and the timing belt change interval ... More about Renault Clio 2012 1.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.04 m | 4.06 m | |
| Width: | 1.73 m | 1.73 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.45 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Hyundai i20 is 3 cm shorter than the Renault Clio, width is practically the same , while the height of Hyundai i20 is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 326 litres | 300 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1042 litres | no data | |
|
Hyundai i20 has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Hyundai i20 has 26 litres more trunk space than the Renault Clio. The Renault Clio may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Hyundai i20 is 0.4 metres less than that of the Renault Clio, which means Hyundai i20 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`680 | 1`658 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Renault Clio scores higher in safety tests. The Renault Clio scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | average | below average | |
| Hyundai i20 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Clio has serious deffects in 25 percent more cases than Hyundai i20, so Hyundai i20 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 5400 | 9200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Hyundai i20 has
|
Renault Clio has
| |