Hyundai i20 2016 vs Nissan Note 2013
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 120 HP | 80 HP | |
| Torque: | 172 NM | 110 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.2 seconds | 13.7 seconds | |
|
Hyundai i20 is more dynamic to drive. Hyundai i20 engine produces 40 HP more power than Nissan Note, whereas torque is 62 NM more than Nissan Note. Thanks to more power Hyundai i20 reaches 100 km/h speed 3.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.6 | 4.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.3 l/100km | 5.8 l/100km | |
|
The Nissan Note is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Hyundai i20 consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Note, which means that by driving the Hyundai i20 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Hyundai i20 consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Note. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 41 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1080 km in combined cycle | 870 km in combined cycle | |
| 1280 km on highway | 1000 km on highway | ||
| 790 km with real consumption | 700 km with real consumption | ||
| Hyundai i20 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 300'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Nissan Note engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 9 years | 14 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Kia Ceed, Hyundai i30, Kia RIO, Kia Picanto, Hyundai Kona | Used also on Nissan Micra | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Hyundai i20 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.04 m | 4.10 m | |
| Width: | 1.73 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.53 m | |
| Hyundai i20 is 7 cm shorter than the Nissan Note, 4 cm wider, while the height of Hyundai i20 is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 326 litres | 325 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1042 litres | 1495 litres | |
| Hyundai i20 has 1 litres more trunk space than the Nissan Note. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Note (by 453 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Hyundai i20 is 0.5 metres less than that of the Nissan Note, which means Hyundai i20 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`640 | 1`510 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Nissan Note is better rated in child safety tests. The Nissan Note scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | above average | average | |
| Hyundai i20 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan Note has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Hyundai i20, so Hyundai i20 quality is probably slightly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 6000 | 5600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Hyundai i20 has
|
Nissan Note has
| |