Hyundai i20 2014 vs Renault Clio 2012
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 0.9 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 84 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 122 NM | 135 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.1 seconds | 11.8 seconds | |
|
Renault Clio is a more dynamic driving. Hyundai i20 engine produces 6 HP less power than Renault Clio, whereas torque is 13 NM less than Renault Clio. Due to the lower power, Hyundai i20 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 4.3 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 45 litres | |
| 790 km with real consumption | 710 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 18 years | 14 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Hyundai i10, Kia RIO, Kia Picanto | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Dacia Logan, Renault Captur, Nissan Micra, Smart ForFour | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Hyundai i20 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Hyundai i20 2014 1.2 engine: Most owners speak positively about this engine. It has a simple and reliable design with no major engineering flaws. The main downsides are noticeable noise, vibrations, and modest power output. With proper ... More about Hyundai i20 2014 1.2 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.04 m | 4.06 m | |
| Width: | 1.73 m | 1.73 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.45 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Hyundai i20 is 3 cm shorter than the Renault Clio, width is practically the same , while the height of Hyundai i20 is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 326 litres | 300 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1042 litres | no data | |
|
Hyundai i20 has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, The Renault Clio may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Hyundai i20 is 0.4 metres less than that of the Renault Clio, which means Hyundai i20 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`580 kg | 1`588 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`040 kg | 1`009 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 540 kg | 579 kg | |
| Safety: | |||
| Renault Clio scores higher in safety tests. The Renault Clio scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | above average | below average | |
| Hyundai i20 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Clio has serious deffects in 40 percent more cases than Hyundai i20, so Hyundai i20 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 5000 | 4600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Hyundai i20 has
|
Renault Clio has
| |