Hyundai i20 2014 vs Hyundai ix20 2010
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 100 HP | 124 HP | |
| Torque: | 134 NM | 156 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.6 seconds | 12.2 seconds | |
| Hyundai i20 engine produces 24 HP less power than Hyundai ix20, whereas torque is 22 NM less than Hyundai ix20. Despite less power, Hyundai i20 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.7 | 6.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.6 l/100km | 8.4 l/100km | |
|
The Hyundai i20 is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Hyundai i20 consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai ix20, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Hyundai i20 could require 30 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Hyundai i20 consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai ix20. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 48 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 740 km in combined cycle | 730 km in combined cycle | |
| 940 km on highway | 870 km on highway | ||
| 650 km with real consumption | 570 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 11 years | 19 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Hyundai i30, Kia RIO | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Kia Ceed, Hyundai Elantra, Hyundai i30, Hyundai Accent, Kia RIO | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Hyundai ix20 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Hyundai i20 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Hyundai ix20 2010 1.6 engine: Overall, the engine is reliable and not very demanding on fuel quality. Fuel injectors tend to be noisy. Timing chain resource is relatively low. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.04 m | 4.10 m | |
| Width: | 1.73 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.60 m | |
|
Hyundai i20 is smaller. Hyundai i20 is 7 cm shorter than the Hyundai ix20, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Hyundai i20 is 13 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 326 litres | 440 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1042 litres | 1486 litres | |
|
Hyundai ix20 has more luggage space. Hyundai i20 has 114 litres less trunk space than the Hyundai ix20. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Hyundai ix20 (by 444 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Hyundai i20 is 0.2 metres less than that of the Hyundai ix20. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`620 | 1`730 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Hyundai ix20 scores higher in safety tests. The Hyundai ix20 scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | low | below average | |
| Hyundai ix20 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Hyundai i20 has serious deffects in 35 percent more cases than Hyundai ix20, so Hyundai ix20 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 5600 | 4800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Hyundai i20 has
|
Hyundai ix20 has
| |