Hyundai i20 2010 vs Mitsubishi Colt 2008
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Diesel | 1.3 Petrol | |
| Diesel (Hyundai i20) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Mitsubishi Colt) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences." | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 95 HP | |
| Torque: | 220 NM | 125 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.6 seconds | 11.1 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Colt is a more dynamic driving. Hyundai i20 engine produces 5 HP less power than Mitsubishi Colt, but torque is 95 NM more than Mitsubishi Colt. Due to the lower power, Hyundai i20 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.4 | 5.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.3 l/100km | 6.5 l/100km | |
|
The Hyundai i20 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Hyundai i20 consumes 1.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Colt, which means that by driving the Hyundai i20 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 210 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Hyundai i20 consumes 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Colt. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 47 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1020 km in combined cycle | 810 km in combined cycle | |
| 1180 km on highway | 970 km on highway | ||
| 840 km with real consumption | 720 km with real consumption | ||
| Hyundai i20 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Mitsubishi Colt 2008 1.3 engine: The Mitsubishi 4A90 is a 1.3-liter aluminum four-cylinder engine with a timing chain, used mainly in compact Mitsubishi models. It is a simple and lightweight unit designed with fuel economy in mind, but over time several characteristic weaknesses tend ... More about Mitsubishi Colt 2008 1.3 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.94 m | 3.94 m | |
| Width: | 1.71 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.49 m | 1.55 m | |
| Hyundai i20 and Mitsubishi Colt are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 295 litres | 220 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1060 litres | 1032 litres | |
|
Hyundai i20 has more luggage capacity. Hyundai i20 has 75 litres more trunk space than the Mitsubishi Colt. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Hyundai i20 (by 28 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Hyundai i20 is 0.4 metres less than that of the Mitsubishi Colt, which means Hyundai i20 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`635 kg | 1`460 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`099 kg | 970 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 536 kg | 490 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | above average | |
| Mitsubishi Colt has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Hyundai i20 has serious deffects in 40 percent more cases than Mitsubishi Colt, so Mitsubishi Colt quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 3000 | 2600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Hyundai i20 has
|
Mitsubishi Colt has
| |