Hyundai i20 2009 vs Renault Clio 2008
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.2 - 1.6 | 1.1 - 1.6 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 - 128 HP | 75 - 128 HP | |
| Torque: | 119 - 260 NM | 105 - 220 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.5 - 16.2 seconds | 9.3 - 13.4 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.4 - 6.5 | 4.7 - 7.5 | |
|
Hyundai i20 petrol engines consumes on average 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than Renault Clio. On average, Hyundai i20 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Clio. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.94 m | 4.03 m | |
| Width: | 1.71 m | 1.71 m | |
| Height: | 1.49 m | 1.49 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Hyundai i20 is 9 cm shorter than the Renault Clio, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 295 litres | 288 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1060 litres | no data | |
| Even though the car is shorter, Hyundai i20 has 7 litres more trunk space than the Renault Clio. The Renault Clio may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Hyundai i20 is 0.3 metres less than that of the Renault Clio. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`588 | ~ 1`628 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 3200 | 2600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Hyundai i20 has
|
Renault Clio has
| |