Hyundai i20 2009 vs Mitsubishi Colt 2008
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.2 - 1.6 (petrol, diesel) | 1.1 - 1.5 (petrol) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 - 128 HP | 75 - 109 HP | |
| Torque: | 119 - 260 NM | 100 - 145 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.5 - 16.2 seconds | 9.8 - 12.8 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.4 - 6.5 | 5.5 - 6.1 | |
|
Hyundai i20 petrol engines consumes on average 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mitsubishi Colt. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.94 m | 3.88 m | |
| Width: | 1.71 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.49 m | 1.52 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Hyundai i20 is 6 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Colt, 2 cm wider, while the height of Hyundai i20 is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 295 litres | 220 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1060 litres | no data | |
|
Hyundai i20 has more luggage capacity. Hyundai i20 has 75 litres more trunk space than the Mitsubishi Colt. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Hyundai i20 is 0.4 metres less than that of the Mitsubishi Colt, which means Hyundai i20 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`588 | ~ 1`439 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 3400 | 3000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Hyundai i20 has
|
Mitsubishi Colt has
| |