Hyundai i10 2017 vs Suzuki Swift 2017
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 66 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 95 NM | 120 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15 seconds | 11.9 seconds | |
|
Suzuki Swift is a more dynamic driving. Hyundai i10 engine produces 24 HP less power than Suzuki Swift, whereas torque is 25 NM less than Suzuki Swift. Due to the lower power, Hyundai i10 reaches 100 km/h speed 3.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.0 | 4.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.6 l/100km | 5.2 l/100km | |
|
The Suzuki Swift is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Hyundai i10 consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Swift, which means that by driving the Hyundai i10 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Hyundai i10 consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Swift. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 40 litres | 37 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1000 km in combined cycle | 860 km in combined cycle | |
| 1140 km on highway | 1000 km on highway | ||
| 710 km with real consumption | 710 km with real consumption | ||
| Hyundai i10 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 390'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Hyundai i10 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 13 years | 12 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Kia Picanto | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Suzuki Baleno, Suzuki Ignis | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Suzuki Swift might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Hyundai i10 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.67 m | 3.84 m | |
| Width: | 1.66 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.50 m | 1.50 m | |
|
Hyundai i10 is smaller, but slightly higher. Hyundai i10 is 18 cm shorter than the Suzuki Swift, 8 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 252 litres | 265 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1046 litres | 947 litres | |
| Hyundai i10 has 13 litres less trunk space than the Suzuki Swift. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Hyundai i10 (by 99 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.6 meters | 9.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`420 | 1`365 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | above average | |
| Suzuki Swift has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Hyundai i10 has serious deffects in 70 percent more cases than Suzuki Swift, so Suzuki Swift quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 7600 | 11 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Hyundai i10 has
|
Suzuki Swift has
| |