Hyundai i10 2017 vs Mitsubishi Space Star 2016
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 66 HP | 80 HP | |
| Torque: | 95 NM | 106 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15 seconds | 11.7 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Space Star is a more dynamic driving. Hyundai i10 engine produces 14 HP less power than Mitsubishi Space Star, whereas torque is 11 NM less than Mitsubishi Space Star. Due to the lower power, Hyundai i10 reaches 100 km/h speed 3.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.0 | 4.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.6 l/100km | 5.3 l/100km | |
|
The Mitsubishi Space Star is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Hyundai i10 consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Space Star, which means that by driving the Hyundai i10 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Hyundai i10 consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Space Star. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 40 litres | 35 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1000 km in combined cycle | 850 km in combined cycle | |
| 1140 km on highway | 940 km on highway | ||
| 710 km with real consumption | 660 km with real consumption | ||
| Hyundai i10 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 390'000 km | 320'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Hyundai i10 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 15 years | 14 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Kia Picanto | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Hyundai i10 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Hyundai i10 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.67 m | 3.80 m | |
| Width: | 1.66 m | 1.67 m | |
| Height: | 1.50 m | 1.51 m | |
|
Hyundai i10 is smaller. Hyundai i10 is 13 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Space Star, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 252 litres | 235 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1046 litres | 912 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, The Mitsubishi Space Star may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Hyundai i10 (by 134 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.6 meters | 9.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Hyundai i10 is 0.4 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Space Star, which means Hyundai i10 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`420 kg | 1`340 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`008 kg | 845 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 412 kg | 495 kg | |
| Hyundai i10 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 20 procentiem less than Mitsubishi Space Star. Therefore, Mitsubishi Space Star is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 7400 | 4600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Hyundai i10 has
|
Mitsubishi Space Star has
| |