Hyundai i10 2011 vs Renault Twingo 2012
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.1 Petrol | 1.1 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 69 HP | 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 99 NM | 107 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15.2 seconds | 12.3 seconds | |
|
Renault Twingo is a more dynamic driving. Hyundai i10 engine produces 6 HP less power than Renault Twingo, whereas torque is 8 NM less than Renault Twingo. Due to the lower power, Hyundai i10 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.7 | 4.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.3 l/100km | 5.7 l/100km | |
|
The Renault Twingo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Hyundai i10 consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Twingo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Hyundai i10 could require 30 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Hyundai i10 consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Twingo. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 35 litres | 40 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 740 km in combined cycle | 880 km in combined cycle | |
| 850 km on highway | 1080 km on highway | ||
| 550 km with real consumption | 700 km with real consumption | ||
| Renault Twingo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 149 mm (5.9 inches) | 120 mm (4.7 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Hyundai i10 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Hyundai i10 version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 9 years | 17 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Renault Clio, Dacia Logan, Renault Kangoo, Dacia Sandero | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Twingo might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.59 m | 3.69 m | |
| Width: | 1.60 m | 1.65 m | |
| Height: | 1.54 m | 1.47 m | |
|
Hyundai i10 is smaller, but higher. Hyundai i10 is 11 cm shorter than the Renault Twingo, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Hyundai i10 is 7 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 225 litres | 165 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
910 litres | 959 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, Hyundai i10 has 60 litres more trunk space than the Renault Twingo. The Renault Twingo may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Renault Twingo (by 49 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.5 meters | 9.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Hyundai i10 is 0.4 metres less than that of the Renault Twingo, which means Hyundai i10 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`405 | 1`360 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | low | |
| Hyundai i10 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Twingo has serious deffects in 35 percent more cases than Hyundai i10, so Hyundai i10 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2800 | 3600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Hyundai i10 has
|
Renault Twingo has
| |