Hyundai i10 2013 vs Suzuki Swift 2017
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 66 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 94 NM | 230 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15.1 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Hyundai i10 engine produces 74 HP less power than Suzuki Swift, whereas torque is 136 NM less than Suzuki Swift. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.3 | 5.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.7 l/100km | 6.3 l/100km | |
|
The Hyundai i10 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Hyundai i10 consumes 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Swift, which means that by driving the Hyundai i10 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 180 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Hyundai i10 consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Swift. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 40 litres | 37 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 930 km in combined cycle | 670 km in combined cycle | |
| 1080 km on highway | 770 km on highway | ||
| 700 km with real consumption | 580 km with real consumption | ||
| Hyundai i10 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 165 mm (6.5 inches) | 120 mm (4.7 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Hyundai i10 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Hyundai i10 version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 390'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Hyundai i10 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 13 years | 9 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Kia Picanto | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Suzuki SX4, Suzuki Vitara | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.67 m | 3.89 m | |
| Width: | 1.66 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.50 m | 1.50 m | |
|
Hyundai i10 is smaller, but slightly higher. Hyundai i10 is 22 cm shorter than the Suzuki Swift, 8 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 252 litres | 266 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1046 litres | no data | |
| Hyundai i10 has 14 litres less trunk space than the Suzuki Swift. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.6 meters | 10.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Hyundai i10 is 0.6 metres less than that of the Suzuki Swift, which means Hyundai i10 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`420 | 1`445 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Hyundai i10 scores higher in safety tests, but Suzuki Swift is better rated in child safety tests. The Hyundai i10 scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | low | average | |
| Suzuki Swift has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Hyundai i10 has serious deffects in 55 percent more cases than Suzuki Swift, so Suzuki Swift quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 7400 | 11 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Hyundai i10 has
|
Suzuki Swift has
| |