Hyundai i10 2013 vs Skoda Citigo 2017
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 66 HP | 60 HP | |
| Torque: | 94 NM | 95 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15.1 seconds | 14.4 seconds | |
|
Skoda Citigo is a more dynamic driving. Hyundai i10 engine produces 6 HP more power than Skoda Citigo, but torque is 1 NM less than Skoda Citigo. Despite the higher power, Hyundai i10 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.3 | 4.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.7 l/100km | 5.1 l/100km | |
|
The Skoda Citigo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Hyundai i10 consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Citigo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Hyundai i10 could require 30 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Hyundai i10 consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Citigo. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 40 litres | 35 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 930 km in combined cycle | 850 km in combined cycle | |
| 1080 km on highway | 940 km on highway | ||
| 700 km with real consumption | 680 km with real consumption | ||
| Hyundai i10 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 165 mm (6.5 inches) | 121 mm (4.8 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Hyundai i10 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Hyundai i10 version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.67 m | 3.56 m | |
| Width: | 1.66 m | 1.65 m | |
| Height: | 1.50 m | 1.48 m | |
|
Hyundai i10 is larger. Hyundai i10 is 10 cm longer than the Skoda Citigo, 2 cm wider, while the height of Hyundai i10 is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 252 litres | 251 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1046 litres | 959 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 9.6 meters | 9.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Hyundai i10 is 0.2 metres less than that of the Skoda Citigo. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`420 kg | 1`290 kg | |
| Net weight: | 933 kg | 865 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 487 kg | 425 kg | |
| Hyundai i10 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 13 procentiem more than Skoda Citigo. Therefore, Hyundai i10 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | |||
| Hyundai i10 scores higher in safety tests. | |||
| Quality: | low | below average | |
| Skoda Citigo has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Hyundai i10 has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Skoda Citigo, so Skoda Citigo quality is probably slightly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 6800 | 6400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Hyundai i10 has
|
Skoda Citigo has
| |