Hyundai Tucson 2004 vs Honda CR-V 2004
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 141 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 184 NM | 190 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.4 seconds | 10.8 seconds | |
| Hyundai Tucson engine produces 9 HP less power than Honda CR-V, whereas torque is 6 NM less than Honda CR-V. Despite less power, Hyundai Tucson reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.0 | 9.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.3 l/100km | 9.9 l/100km | |
|
By specification Hyundai Tucson consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V, which means that by driving the Hyundai Tucson over 15,000 km in a year you can save 150 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Hyundai Tucson consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 720 km in combined cycle | 640 km in combined cycle | |
| 870 km on highway | 760 km on highway | ||
| 560 km with real consumption | 580 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
Honda CR-V 2004: Car features Honda`s real-time four-wheel-drive system, which sends torque to the front wheels under normal conditions. A multi-plate clutch transfers torque to the rear axle when wheel slip is detected (pressure is applied to the clutch by a dual-pump system). To allow ABS to work smoothly, the clutch is also disengaged during braking. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 400'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 11 years | 11 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Kia Sportage, Kia Ceed, Hyundai Sonata, Hyundai Elantra | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Honda Civic, Honda Accord, Honda FR-V, Honda Stream | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Hyundai Tucson might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.32 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.73 m | 1.71 m | |
| Hyundai Tucson is 32 cm shorter than the Honda CR-V, 5 cm wider, while the height of Hyundai Tucson is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 644 litres | 527 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 952 litres | |
|
Hyundai Tucson has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Hyundai Tucson has 117 litres more trunk space than the Honda CR-V. The Honda CR-V may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Hyundai Tucson is 0.4 metres more than that of the Honda CR-V, which means Hyundai Tucson can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`100 | 1`910 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | high | |
| Honda CR-V has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Hyundai Tucson has serious deffects in 65 percent more cases than Honda CR-V, so Honda CR-V quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 3400 | 3200 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.4/10 | 8.4/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Hyundai Tucson has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |