Hyundai Tucson 2004 vs Honda CR-V 2004
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 112 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 245 NM | 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 16.1 seconds | 10.6 seconds | |
|
Honda CR-V is a more dynamic driving. Hyundai Tucson engine produces 28 HP less power than Honda CR-V, whereas torque is 95 NM less than Honda CR-V. Due to the lower power, Hyundai Tucson reaches 100 km/h speed 5.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.0 | 6.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.5 l/100km | 7.5 l/100km | |
|
The Honda CR-V is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Hyundai Tucson consumes 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Hyundai Tucson could require 195 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Hyundai Tucson consumes 2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 720 km in combined cycle | 860 km in combined cycle | |
| 860 km on highway | 980 km on highway | ||
| 610 km with real consumption | 770 km with real consumption | ||
| Honda CR-V gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 11 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 10 other car models, including Hyundai Santa FE, Kia Sportage, Kia Ceed, Hyundai Sonata | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Honda Civic, Honda Accord, Honda FR-V | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Hyundai Tucson might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Hyundai Tucson engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Honda CR-V 2004 2.2 engine: Honda’s first diesel engine featured an aluminum block, a variable-geometry turbocharger, second-generation Bosch Common Rail injection, 16-valve cylinder head, and a balance shaft integrated into the crankcase. The ... More about Honda CR-V 2004 2.2 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.32 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.73 m | 1.71 m | |
| Hyundai Tucson is 32 cm shorter than the Honda CR-V, 5 cm wider, while the height of Hyundai Tucson is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 644 litres | 525 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 952 litres | |
|
Hyundai Tucson has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Hyundai Tucson has 119 litres more trunk space than the Honda CR-V. The Honda CR-V may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Hyundai Tucson is 0.2 metres more than that of the Honda CR-V. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`210 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | high | |
| Honda CR-V has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Hyundai Tucson has serious deffects in 60 percent more cases than Honda CR-V, so Honda CR-V quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 3400 | 2600 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.4/10 | 8.4/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Hyundai Tucson has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |