Hyundai Tucson 2004 vs Mitsubishi Pajero 2003
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 3.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 112 HP | 160 HP | |
| Torque: | 245 NM | 373 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.8 seconds | 13.2 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Pajero is a more dynamic driving. Hyundai Tucson engine produces 48 HP less power than Mitsubishi Pajero, whereas torque is 128 NM less than Mitsubishi Pajero. Due to the lower power, Hyundai Tucson reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.1 | 10.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.3 l/100km | 11.2 l/100km | |
|
The Hyundai Tucson is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Hyundai Tucson consumes 3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Pajero, which means that by driving the Hyundai Tucson over 15,000 km in a year you can save 450 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Hyundai Tucson consumes 2.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Pajero. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 90 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 810 km in combined cycle | 890 km in combined cycle | |
| 980 km on highway | 1050 km on highway | ||
| 690 km with real consumption | 800 km with real consumption | ||
| Mitsubishi Pajero gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.32 m | 4.32 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.73 m | 1.84 m | |
| Hyundai Tucson and Mitsubishi Pajero are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 644 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Hyundai Tucson is 0.2 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Pajero. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`210 | 2`800 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | below average | |
| Hyundai Tucson has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mitsubishi Pajero has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Hyundai Tucson, so Hyundai Tucson quality is probably slightly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 3400 | 4000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Hyundai Tucson has
|
Mitsubishi Pajero has
| |