Hyundai Tucson 2004 vs Land Rover Freelander 2003
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 112 HP | 112 HP | |
| Torque: | 245 NM | 260 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.8 seconds | 15.3 seconds | |
| Hyundai Tucson and Land Rover Freelander have the same engine power, but Hyundai Tucson torque is 15 NM less than Land Rover Freelander. Hyundai Tucson reaches 100 km/h speed 1.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.1 | 8.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.3 l/100km | 9.1 l/100km | |
|
The Hyundai Tucson is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Hyundai Tucson consumes 1.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Freelander, which means that by driving the Hyundai Tucson over 15,000 km in a year you can save 225 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Hyundai Tucson consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Freelander. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 59 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 810 km in combined cycle | 680 km in combined cycle | |
| 980 km on highway | 830 km on highway | ||
| 690 km with real consumption | 640 km with real consumption | ||
| Hyundai Tucson gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 11 years | 6 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 10 other car models, including Hyundai Santa FE, Kia Sportage, Kia Ceed, Hyundai Sonata | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Hyundai Tucson might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.32 m | 4.42 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.73 m | 1.72 m | |
| Hyundai Tucson is 10 cm shorter than the Land Rover Freelander, 2 cm wider, while the height of Hyundai Tucson is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 644 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Hyundai Tucson is 0.8 metres less than that of the Land Rover Freelander, which means Hyundai Tucson can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`210 | 2`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 3400 | 2600 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.4/10 | 7.6/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Hyundai Tucson has
|
Land Rover Freelander has
| |