Hyundai Tucson 2004 vs Land Rover Freelander 2007
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain and belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 112 HP | 160 HP | |
| Torque: | 245 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.8 seconds | 11.7 seconds | |
|
Land Rover Freelander is a more dynamic driving. Hyundai Tucson engine produces 48 HP less power than Land Rover Freelander, whereas torque is 155 NM less than Land Rover Freelander. Due to the lower power, Hyundai Tucson reaches 100 km/h speed 2.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.1 | 7.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.3 l/100km | 8.5 l/100km | |
|
The Hyundai Tucson is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Hyundai Tucson consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Freelander, which means that by driving the Hyundai Tucson over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Hyundai Tucson consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Freelander. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 68 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 810 km in combined cycle | 900 km in combined cycle | |
| 690 km with real consumption | 800 km with real consumption | ||
| Land Rover Freelander gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 11 years | 10 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 10 other car models, including Hyundai Santa FE, Kia Sportage, Kia Ceed, Hyundai Sonata | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Jaguar XF, Land Rover Discovery Sport | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Hyundai Tucson might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hyundai Tucson 2004 2.0 engine: The Hyundai/Kia 2.0 CRDi engine with the D4EA code is a cast-iron diesel unit introduced in the early 2000s. It is known for solid durability and, when properly maintained, can often reach 300,000–400,000 km. The engine appeared in several versions over the years. Early variants produced around 112 hp with a conventional ... More about Hyundai Tucson 2004 2.0 engine Land Rover Freelander 2007 2.2 engine: This engine is recognized for its reliability, power, and relatively low fuel consumption, as well as its durability in demanding conditions without frequent failures. However, it is sensitible to oil quality ... More about Land Rover Freelander 2007 2.2 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.32 m | 4.50 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.91 m | |
| Height: | 1.73 m | 1.74 m | |
|
Hyundai Tucson is smaller. Hyundai Tucson is 18 cm shorter than the Land Rover Freelander, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Hyundai Tucson is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 644 litres | 755 litres | |
|
Land Rover Freelander has more luggage space. Hyundai Tucson has 111 litres less trunk space than the Land Rover Freelander. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Hyundai Tucson is 0.6 metres less than that of the Land Rover Freelander, which means Hyundai Tucson can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`210 kg | 2`000 kg | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 3200 | 5000 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.4/10 | 7.4/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Hyundai Tucson has
|
Land Rover Freelander has
| |