Hyundai Tucson 2004 vs Mitsubishi ASX 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 1.8 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 112 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 245 NM | 300 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.8 seconds | 10 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi ASX is a more dynamic driving. Hyundai Tucson engine produces 38 HP less power than Mitsubishi ASX, whereas torque is 55 NM less than Mitsubishi ASX. Due to the lower power, Hyundai Tucson reaches 100 km/h speed 3.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.1 | 5.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.3 l/100km | 6.8 l/100km | |
|
The Mitsubishi ASX is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Hyundai Tucson consumes 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi ASX, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Hyundai Tucson could require 210 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Hyundai Tucson consumes 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi ASX. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 63 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 810 km in combined cycle | 1100 km in combined cycle | |
| 980 km on highway | 1280 km on highway | ||
| 690 km with real consumption | 920 km with real consumption | ||
| Mitsubishi ASX gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 11 years | 5 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 10 other car models, including Hyundai Santa FE, Kia Sportage, Kia Ceed, Hyundai Sonata | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Hyundai Tucson might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Hyundai Tucson engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.32 m | 4.30 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.73 m | 1.62 m | |
|
Hyundai Tucson is larger. Hyundai Tucson is 3 cm longer than the Mitsubishi ASX, 6 cm wider, while the height of Hyundai Tucson is 12 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 644 litres | 419 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1219 litres | |
|
Hyundai Tucson has more luggage capacity. Hyundai Tucson has 225 litres more trunk space than the Mitsubishi ASX. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Hyundai Tucson is 0.2 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi ASX. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`210 | no data | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | low | high | |
| Mitsubishi ASX has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Hyundai Tucson has serious deffects in 195 percent more cases than Mitsubishi ASX, so Mitsubishi ASX quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 3400 | 6000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Hyundai Tucson has
|
Mitsubishi ASX has
| |