Hyundai Tucson 2020 vs Mitsubishi ASX 2019
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 117 HP | |
| Torque: | 250 NM | 154 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.3 seconds | 11.4 seconds | |
|
Hyundai Tucson is more dynamic to drive. Hyundai Tucson engine produces 33 HP more power than Mitsubishi ASX, whereas torque is 96 NM more than Mitsubishi ASX. Thanks to more power Hyundai Tucson reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.9 | 6.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.3 l/100km | 7.0 l/100km | |
|
The Mitsubishi ASX is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Hyundai Tucson consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi ASX, which means that by driving the Hyundai Tucson over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Hyundai Tucson consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi ASX. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 54 litres | 63 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 910 km in combined cycle | 1030 km in combined cycle | |
| 1030 km on highway | 1260 km on highway | ||
| 730 km with real consumption | 900 km with real consumption | ||
| Mitsubishi ASX gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 170 mm (6.7 inches) | 190 mm (7.5 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Mitsubishi ASX can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Mitsubishi ASX version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 5 years | 15 years | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mitsubishi ASX might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.50 m | 4.37 m | |
| Width: | 1.87 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.67 m | 1.64 m | |
|
Hyundai Tucson is larger. Hyundai Tucson is 14 cm longer than the Mitsubishi ASX, 6 cm wider, while the height of Hyundai Tucson is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 577 litres | 384 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1756 litres | 1206 litres | |
|
Hyundai Tucson has more luggage capacity. Hyundai Tucson has 193 litres more trunk space than the Mitsubishi ASX. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Hyundai Tucson (by 550 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Hyundai Tucson is 0.3 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi ASX. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`065 | 1`870 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 23 400 | 14 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Hyundai Tucson has
|
Mitsubishi ASX has
| |