Hyundai Tucson 2020 vs Mazda CX-5 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 60 HP | 155 HP | |
| Torque: | 265 NM | 196 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Hyundai Tucson engine produces 95 HP less power than Mazda CX-5, but torque is 69 NM more than Mazda CX-5. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.9 | 6.9 | |
|
The Hyundai Tucson is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Hyundai Tucson consumes 2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda CX-5, which means that by driving the Hyundai Tucson over 15,000 km in a year you can save 300 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 52 litres | 56 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1060 km in combined cycle | 810 km in combined cycle | |
| 1100 km on highway | 900 km on highway | ||
| Hyundai Tucson gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 170 mm (6.7 inches) | 193 mm (7.6 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Mazda CX-5 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Mazda CX-5 version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. Choose from six 4x4 versions of Mazda CX-5 2017 if off-road driveability is important to you. | |||
| Mazda CX-5 2017 2.0 engine: The engine tends to idle unevenly. Engine problems may also include the thermostat and cooling pump. This engine tends to consume more oil at higher mileages. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.50 m | 4.55 m | |
| Width: | 1.87 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.67 m | 1.68 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Hyundai Tucson is 5 cm shorter than the Mazda CX-5, 3 cm wider, while the height of Hyundai Tucson is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 616 litres | 477 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1795 litres | 1620 litres | |
|
Hyundai Tucson has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, The Mazda CX-5 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Hyundai Tucson (by 175 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Hyundai Tucson is 0.1 metres less than that of the Mazda CX-5. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`175 kg | 2`025 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`564 kg | 1`559 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 611 kg | 466 kg | |
| Hyundai Tucson load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 24 procentiem more than Mazda CX-5. Therefore, Hyundai Tucson is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | |||
| Hyundai Tucson is better rated in child safety tests. The Hyundai Tucson scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 22 000 | 20 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Hyundai Tucson has
|
Mazda CX-5 has
| |