Hyundai Tucson 2020 vs Honda CR-V 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.5 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 180 HP | 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 265 NM | 243 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Hyundai Tucson engine produces 10 HP less power than Honda CR-V, but torque is 22 NM more than Honda CR-V. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.2 | 8.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.5 l/100km | 9.2 l/100km | |
|
The Hyundai Tucson is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Hyundai Tucson consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V, which means that by driving the Hyundai Tucson over 15,000 km in a year you can save 135 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Hyundai Tucson consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 54 litres | 53 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 750 km in combined cycle | 650 km in combined cycle | |
| 850 km on highway | 740 km on highway | ||
| 630 km with real consumption | 570 km with real consumption | ||
| Hyundai Tucson gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
| Ground clearance: | 181 mm (7.1 inches) | 208 mm (8.2 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Honda CR-V can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 250'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Honda CR-V engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 14 years | 12 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 9 other car models, including Kia Sportage, Kia Ceed, Hyundai Sonata, Hyundai Elantra | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Honda Civic, Honda Accord | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Hyundai Tucson might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.63 m | 4.59 m | |
| Width: | 1.87 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.67 m | 1.68 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Hyundai Tucson is 4 cm longer than the Honda CR-V, 1 cm wider, while the height of Hyundai Tucson is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 539 litres | 497 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1860 litres | 1110 litres | |
|
Hyundai Tucson has more luggage capacity. Hyundai Tucson has 42 litres more trunk space than the Honda CR-V. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Hyundai Tucson (by 750 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Hyundai Tucson is 0.4 metres more than that of the Honda CR-V, which means Hyundai Tucson can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`190 | no data | |
| Safety: | |||
| Honda CR-V scores higher in safety tests. The Honda CR-V scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 24 400 | 19 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Hyundai Tucson has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |