Hyundai Tucson 2018 vs Renault Kadjar 2018
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 1.7 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 136 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.4 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Hyundai Tucson engine produces 14 HP less power than Renault Kadjar, whereas torque is 20 NM less than Renault Kadjar. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.2 | 5.9 | |
|
The Hyundai Tucson is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Hyundai Tucson consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Kadjar, which means that by driving the Hyundai Tucson over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 62 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1190 km in combined cycle | 930 km in combined cycle | |
| Hyundai Tucson gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
| Ground clearance: | 172 mm (6.8 inches) | 200 mm (7.9 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Renault Kadjar can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Renault Kadjar engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 9 years | 10 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Kia Sportage, Kia Ceed, Hyundai i30, Kia Optima | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Nissan X-Trail, Nissan Qashqai, Renault Scenic, Renault Megane | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Kadjar might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.48 m | 4.49 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.65 m | 1.61 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Hyundai Tucson is 1 cm shorter than the Renault Kadjar, 1 cm wider, while the height of Hyundai Tucson is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 513 litres | 472 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1503 litres | 1478 litres | |
|
Hyundai Tucson has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, The Renault Kadjar may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Hyundai Tucson (by 25 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.7 meters | |
| Gross weight: | 2`195 kg | 2`139 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`578 kg | 1`692 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 617 kg | 447 kg | |
| Hyundai Tucson load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 28 procentiem more than Renault Kadjar. Therefore, Hyundai Tucson is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | above average | |
| Renault Kadjar has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Hyundai Tucson has serious deffects in 55 percent more cases than Renault Kadjar, so Renault Kadjar quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 15 600 | 17 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Hyundai Tucson has
|
Renault Kadjar has
| |