Hyundai Tucson 2015 vs Mitsubishi ASX 2012
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 132 HP | 117 HP | |
| Torque: | 161 NM | 154 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.1 seconds | 11.4 seconds | |
| Hyundai Tucson engine produces 15 HP more power than Mitsubishi ASX, whereas torque is 7 NM more than Mitsubishi ASX. Despite the higher power, Hyundai Tucson reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.4 | 5.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.5 l/100km | 6.9 l/100km | |
|
The Mitsubishi ASX is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Hyundai Tucson consumes 1.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi ASX, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Hyundai Tucson could require 240 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Hyundai Tucson consumes 1.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi ASX. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 62 litres | 63 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 830 km in combined cycle | 1080 km in combined cycle | |
| 1030 km on highway | 1280 km on highway | ||
| 720 km with real consumption | 910 km with real consumption | ||
| Mitsubishi ASX gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 172 mm (6.8 inches) | 190 mm (7.5 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Mitsubishi ASX can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Mitsubishi ASX version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. Choose from seven 4x4 versions of Mitsubishi ASX 2012 if off-road driveability is important to you. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 15 years | 14 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Kia Sportage, Kia Ceed, Hyundai Elantra, Hyundai i30 | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Hyundai Tucson might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.48 m | 4.30 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.65 m | 1.62 m | |
|
Hyundai Tucson is larger. Hyundai Tucson is 18 cm longer than the Mitsubishi ASX, 8 cm wider, while the height of Hyundai Tucson is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 513 litres | 442 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1503 litres | 1219 litres | |
|
Hyundai Tucson has more luggage capacity. Hyundai Tucson has 71 litres more trunk space than the Mitsubishi ASX. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Hyundai Tucson (by 284 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`050 | 1`870 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | high | |
| Mitsubishi ASX has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Hyundai Tucson has serious deffects in 75 percent more cases than Mitsubishi ASX, so Mitsubishi ASX quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 15 200 | 11 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Hyundai Tucson has
|
Mitsubishi ASX has
| |