Hyundai Tucson 2015 vs Skoda Yeti 2013
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 177 HP | 122 HP | |
| Torque: | 265 NM | 200 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.2 seconds | 10.6 seconds | |
|
Hyundai Tucson is more dynamic to drive. Hyundai Tucson engine produces 55 HP more power than Skoda Yeti, whereas torque is 65 NM more than Skoda Yeti. Thanks to more power Hyundai Tucson reaches 100 km/h speed 1.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.6 | 6.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.6 l/100km | 7.6 l/100km | |
|
The Skoda Yeti is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Hyundai Tucson consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Yeti, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Hyundai Tucson could require 120 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Hyundai Tucson consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Yeti. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 62 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 810 km in combined cycle | 880 km in combined cycle | |
| 840 km on highway | 1010 km on highway | ||
| 720 km with real consumption | 780 km with real consumption | ||
| Skoda Yeti gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 250'000 km | 380'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Skoda Yeti engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 14 years | 9 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 9 other car models, including Kia Sportage, Kia Ceed, Hyundai Sonata, Hyundai Elantra | Installed on at least 11 other car models, including Volkswagen Passat, Volkswagen Golf, Skoda Octavia, Audi A3 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Skoda Yeti engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Skoda Yeti 2013 1.4 engine: The engine is prone to increased vibration at idle. The engine is also very demanding on fuel quality. The timing chain has a low life expectancy and must be monitored. Turbine problems are also common. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.48 m | 4.22 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.65 m | 1.69 m | |
|
Hyundai Tucson is larger, but lower. Hyundai Tucson is 25 cm longer than the Skoda Yeti, 6 cm wider, while the height of Hyundai Tucson is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 513 litres | 405 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1503 litres | no data | |
|
Hyundai Tucson has more luggage capacity. Hyundai Tucson has 108 litres more trunk space than the Skoda Yeti. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Hyundai Tucson is 0.3 metres more than that of the Skoda Yeti. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`120 | 1`940 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | below average | |
| Skoda Yeti has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Hyundai Tucson has serious deffects in 25 percent more cases than Skoda Yeti, so Skoda Yeti quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 14 800 | 8600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Hyundai Tucson has
|
Skoda Yeti has
| |