Hyundai Tucson 2016 vs Renault Kadjar 2015
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.7 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 141 HP | 130 HP | |
| Torque: | 340 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.5 seconds | 9.9 seconds | |
| Hyundai Tucson engine produces 11 HP more power than Renault Kadjar, whereas torque is 20 NM more than Renault Kadjar. Despite the higher power, Hyundai Tucson reaches 100 km/h speed 1.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.9 | 4.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.8 l/100km | 6.3 l/100km | |
|
The Renault Kadjar is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Hyundai Tucson consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Kadjar, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Hyundai Tucson could require 90 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Hyundai Tucson consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Kadjar. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 62 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1260 km in combined cycle | 1390 km in combined cycle | |
| 1310 km on highway | 1530 km on highway | ||
| 910 km with real consumption | 950 km with real consumption | ||
| Renault Kadjar gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 172 mm (6.8 inches) | 200 mm (7.9 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Renault Kadjar can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Renault Kadjar version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 9 years | 13 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Hyundai Sonata, Hyundai i40, Kia Optima | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Nissan X-Trail, Nissan Qashqai, Renault Scenic, Renault Megane | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Kadjar might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.48 m | 4.45 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.65 m | 1.61 m | |
|
Hyundai Tucson is larger. Hyundai Tucson is 3 cm longer than the Renault Kadjar, 1 cm wider, while the height of Hyundai Tucson is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 513 litres | 472 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1503 litres | 1478 litres | |
|
Hyundai Tucson has more luggage capacity. Hyundai Tucson has 41 litres more trunk space than the Renault Kadjar. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Hyundai Tucson (by 25 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Hyundai Tucson is 0.1 metres less than that of the Renault Kadjar. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`085 | 1`946 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | below average | above average | |
| Renault Kadjar has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Hyundai Tucson has serious deffects in 55 percent more cases than Renault Kadjar, so Renault Kadjar quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 15 200 | 12 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Hyundai Tucson has
|
Renault Kadjar has
| |