Hyundai Tucson 2016 vs Nissan X-Trail 2014
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.7 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 141 HP | 130 HP | |
| Torque: | 340 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.5 seconds | 11.4 seconds | |
| Hyundai Tucson engine produces 11 HP more power than Nissan X-Trail, whereas torque is 20 NM more than Nissan X-Trail. Despite the higher power, Hyundai Tucson reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.9 | 5.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.8 l/100km | 7.2 l/100km | |
|
The Hyundai Tucson is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Hyundai Tucson consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan X-Trail, which means that by driving the Hyundai Tucson over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Hyundai Tucson consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan X-Trail. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 62 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1260 km in combined cycle | 1170 km in combined cycle | |
| 1310 km on highway | 1270 km on highway | ||
| 910 km with real consumption | 830 km with real consumption | ||
| Hyundai Tucson gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 172 mm (6.8 inches) | 210 mm (8.3 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Nissan X-Trail can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Nissan X-Trail version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. Choose from seven 4x4 versions of Nissan X-Trail 2014 if off-road driveability is important to you. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 9 years | 13 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Hyundai Sonata, Hyundai i40, Kia Optima | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Scenic, Renault Megane | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan X-Trail might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.48 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.65 m | 1.71 m | |
| Hyundai Tucson is 17 cm shorter than the Nissan X-Trail, 3 cm wider, while the height of Hyundai Tucson is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 513 litres | 550 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1503 litres | 1877 litres | |
|
Nissan X-Trail has more luggage space. Hyundai Tucson has 37 litres less trunk space than the Nissan X-Trail. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan X-Trail (by 374 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Hyundai Tucson is 0.6 metres less than that of the Nissan X-Trail, which means Hyundai Tucson can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`085 | 2`310 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Hyundai Tucson has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Nissan X-Trail, so Hyundai Tucson quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 15 200 | 12 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Hyundai Tucson has
|
Nissan X-Trail has
| |