Hyundai Tucson 2016 vs BMW X1 2015
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.7 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 141 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 340 NM | 330 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.5 seconds | 9.2 seconds | |
|
BMW X1 is a more dynamic driving. Hyundai Tucson engine produces 9 HP less power than BMW X1, but torque is 10 NM more than BMW X1. Due to the lower power, Hyundai Tucson reaches 100 km/h speed 2.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.9 | 4.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.8 l/100km | 5.8 l/100km | |
|
The BMW X1 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Hyundai Tucson consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW X1, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Hyundai Tucson could require 120 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Hyundai Tucson consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW X1. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 62 litres | 61 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1260 km in combined cycle | 1480 km in combined cycle | |
| 1310 km on highway | 1640 km on highway | ||
| 910 km with real consumption | 1050 km with real consumption | ||
| BMW X1 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 172 mm (6.8 inches) | 183 mm (7.2 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, BMW X1 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this BMW X1 version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. Choose from eight 4x4 versions of BMW X1 2015 if off-road driveability is important to you. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 9 years | 10 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Hyundai Sonata, Hyundai i40, Kia Optima | Used also on BMW 2 sērija | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Hyundai Tucson might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.48 m | 4.44 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.65 m | 1.60 m | |
|
Hyundai Tucson is larger. Hyundai Tucson is 4 cm longer than the BMW X1, 3 cm wider, while the height of Hyundai Tucson is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 513 litres | 505 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1503 litres | 1550 litres | |
| Hyundai Tucson has 8 litres more trunk space than the BMW X1. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in BMW X1 (by 47 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Hyundai Tucson is 0.8 metres less than that of the BMW X1, which means Hyundai Tucson can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`085 | 2`015 | |
| Safety: | |||
| The BMW X1 scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| BMW X1 has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Hyundai Tucson, so BMW X1 quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 15 200 | 17 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Hyundai Tucson has
|
BMW X1 has
| |