Hyundai Tucson 2006 vs Nissan X-Trail 2003
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 305 NM | 314 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.8 seconds | 11.5 seconds | |
|
Nissan X-Trail is a more dynamic driving. Hyundai Tucson engine produces 4 HP more power than Nissan X-Trail, but torque is 9 NM less than Nissan X-Trail. Despite the higher power, Hyundai Tucson reaches 100 km/h speed 1.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.0 | 7.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.7 l/100km | 8.0 l/100km | |
|
The Nissan X-Trail is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Hyundai Tucson consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan X-Trail, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Hyundai Tucson could require 120 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Hyundai Tucson consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan X-Trail. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 720 km in combined cycle | 830 km in combined cycle | |
| 870 km on highway | 960 km on highway | ||
| 660 km with real consumption | 750 km with real consumption | ||
| Nissan X-Trail gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.33 m | 4.51 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.73 m | 1.68 m | |
| Hyundai Tucson is 19 cm shorter than the Nissan X-Trail, 7 cm wider, while the height of Hyundai Tucson is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 480 litres | 410 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1856 litres | 1841 litres | |
|
Hyundai Tucson has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Hyundai Tucson has 70 litres more trunk space than the Nissan X-Trail. The Nissan X-Trail may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Hyundai Tucson (by 15 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`210 | 2`050 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | average | |
| Nissan X-Trail has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Hyundai Tucson has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Nissan X-Trail, so Nissan X-Trail quality is probably slightly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 3400 | 2600 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.4/10 | 7.1/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Hyundai Tucson has
|
Nissan X-Trail has
| |