Hyundai Tucson 2004 vs Honda CR-V 2004
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
Power: | 140 HP | 150 HP | |
Torque: | 186 NM | 190 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.7 seconds | 12 seconds | |
Honda CR-V is a more dynamic driving. Hyundai Tucson engine produces 10 HP less power than Honda CR-V, whereas torque is 4 NM less than Honda CR-V. Due to the lower power, Hyundai Tucson reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.0 | 9.3 | |
Hyundai Tucson consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V, which means that by driving the Hyundai Tucson over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 58 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 640 km in combined cycle | 620 km in combined cycle | |
780 km on highway | 760 km on highway | ||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Honda CR-V 2004: Car features Honda`s real-time four-wheel-drive system, which sends torque to the front wheels under normal conditions. A multi-plate clutch transfers torque to the rear axle when wheel slip is detected (pressure is applied to the clutch by a dual-pump system). To allow ABS to work smoothly, the clutch is also disengaged during braking. | |||
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 400'000 km | 420'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
Engine production duration: | 11 years | 10 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Kia Sportage, Kia Ceed, Hyundai Sonata, Hyundai Elantra | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Honda Civic, Honda Accord, Honda FR-V, Honda Stream | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Hyundai Tucson might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Hyundai Tucson 2004 2.0 engine: Relatively reliable engine with a large resource. Can have inherent vibrations and is noisier than a typical petrol engine. Spare parts widely available. May have problems with ignition system and temperature ... More about Hyundai Tucson 2004 2.0 engine Honda CR-V 2004 2.0 engine: In 2001, Honda introduced the K-series engine lineup, featuring an aluminum block with an open-deck design and cast-iron cylinder liners. It utilizes a port fuel injection system, a 16-valve aluminum cylinder head without hydraulic lifters, individual ignition coils, a VTC cam ... More about Honda CR-V 2004 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.33 m | 4.64 m | |
Width: | 1.83 m | 1.78 m | |
Height: | 1.68 m | 1.71 m | |
Hyundai Tucson is 32 cm shorter than the Honda CR-V, 5 cm wider, while the height of Hyundai Tucson is 3 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 644 litres | 525 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 952 litres | |
Hyundai Tucson has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Hyundai Tucson has 119 litres more trunk space than the Honda CR-V. The Honda CR-V may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
Turning diameter: | no data | 10.4 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`910 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | low | high | |
Honda CR-V has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Hyundai Tucson has serious deffects in 65 percent more cases than Honda CR-V, so Honda CR-V quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 3400 | 2600 | |
Rating in user reviews: | 7.4/10 | 8.4/10 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Hyundai Tucson has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |