Hyundai Tucson 2015 vs Nissan X-Trail 2016
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 185 HP | 177 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.5 seconds | 10 seconds | |
|
Hyundai Tucson is more dynamic to drive. Hyundai Tucson engine produces 8 HP more power than Nissan X-Trail, whereas torque is 20 NM more than Nissan X-Trail. Thanks to more power Hyundai Tucson reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.5 | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 62 litres | 60 litres | |
| 780 km with real consumption | 730 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
| Ground clearance: | 172 mm (6.8 inches) | 210 mm (8.3 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Nissan X-Trail can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 16 years | 14 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Hyundai Santa FE, Kia Sportage, Kia Sorento, Hyundai ix35 | Installed on at least 10 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Opel Vivaro | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan X-Trail might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hyundai Tucson 2015 2.0 engine: The diesel engine is highly reliable when properly maintained, offering an excellent balance of power and fuel efficiency. However, it has several important characteristics and issues that should be ... More about Hyundai Tucson 2015 2.0 engine Nissan X-Trail 2016 2.0 engine: The engine has a good power to fuel consumption ratio and, with careful maintenance, a long service life. The most common problems with these engines are with the fuel injection system and lubrication. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.48 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.65 m | 1.72 m | |
| Hyundai Tucson is 17 cm shorter than the Nissan X-Trail, 3 cm wider, while the height of Hyundai Tucson is 7 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 513 litres | 135 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1503 litres | 1877 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, Hyundai Tucson has 378 litres more trunk space than the Nissan X-Trail. The Nissan X-Trail may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan X-Trail (by 374 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Hyundai Tucson is 0.6 metres less than that of the Nissan X-Trail, which means Hyundai Tucson can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`250 | 2`400 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Hyundai Tucson has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Nissan X-Trail, so Hyundai Tucson quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 14 800 | 11 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Hyundai Tucson has
|
Nissan X-Trail has
| |