Hyundai Tucson 2015 vs Mitsubishi ASX 2012
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 1.8 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 185 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 300 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.5 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Hyundai Tucson engine produces 35 HP more power than Mitsubishi ASX, whereas torque is 100 NM more than Mitsubishi ASX. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.5 | 5.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.9 l/100km | 6.6 l/100km | |
|
The Mitsubishi ASX is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Hyundai Tucson consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi ASX, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Hyundai Tucson could require 120 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Hyundai Tucson consumes 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi ASX. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 62 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 950 km in combined cycle | 1050 km in combined cycle | |
| 1100 km on highway | 1200 km on highway | ||
| 780 km with real consumption | 900 km with real consumption | ||
| Mitsubishi ASX gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 172 mm (6.8 inches) | 170 mm (6.7 inches) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 15 years | 5 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Hyundai Santa FE, Kia Sportage, Kia Sorento, Hyundai ix35 | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Hyundai Tucson might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Hyundai Tucson engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.48 m | 4.30 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.65 m | 1.63 m | |
|
Hyundai Tucson is larger. Hyundai Tucson is 18 cm longer than the Mitsubishi ASX, 8 cm wider, while the height of Hyundai Tucson is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 513 litres | 384 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1503 litres | 1219 litres | |
|
Hyundai Tucson has more luggage capacity. Hyundai Tucson has 129 litres more trunk space than the Mitsubishi ASX. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Hyundai Tucson (by 284 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`250 | 2`060 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | Hyundai Tucson has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mitsubishi ASX has serious deffects in 55 percent more cases than Hyundai Tucson, so Hyundai Tucson quality is probably significantly better | ||
| Average price (€): | 15 200 | 11 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Hyundai Tucson has
|
Mitsubishi ASX has
| |