Hyundai Tucson 2009 vs Nissan X-Trail 2010
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.4 (petrol) | 2.0 - 2.5 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 176 HP | 150 - 173 HP | |
| Torque: | 228 NM | 233 - 360 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 9.8 - 12.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.0 - 9.8 | 6.4 - 9.6 | |
|
Hyundai Tucson petrol engines consumes on average 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than Nissan X-Trail. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.40 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.66 m | 1.70 m | |
| Hyundai Tucson is 24 cm shorter than the Nissan X-Trail, 3 cm wider, while the height of Hyundai Tucson is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 728 litres | 603 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1580 litres | 1773 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, Hyundai Tucson has 125 litres more trunk space than the Nissan X-Trail. The Nissan X-Trail may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan X-Trail (by 193 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Hyundai Tucson is 1 metres less than that of the Nissan X-Trail, which means Hyundai Tucson can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | ~ 2`146 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 4600 | 8600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Hyundai Tucson has
|
Nissan X-Trail has
| |