Hyundai Terracan 2001 vs Volvo XC90 2002
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.9 Diesel | 2.4 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 163 HP | |
| Torque: | 333 NM | 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.7 seconds | 12 seconds | |
|
Volvo XC90 is a more dynamic driving. Hyundai Terracan engine produces 13 HP less power than Volvo XC90, whereas torque is 7 NM less than Volvo XC90. Due to the lower power, Hyundai Terracan reaches 100 km/h speed 1.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.6 | 9.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.6 l/100km | 9.3 l/100km | |
|
The Volvo XC90 is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Hyundai Terracan consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC90, which means that by driving the Hyundai Terracan over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Hyundai Terracan consumes 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC90. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 870 km in combined cycle | 760 km in combined cycle | |
| 1000 km on highway | 930 km on highway | ||
| 700 km with real consumption | 750 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 18 years | 5 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Kia Carnival | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Volvo V70, Volvo S80, Volvo S60, Volvo XC70, Volvo C30 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Volvo XC90 2002 2.4 engine: These diesel engines are frequently affected by intake manifold swirl flap seizures. This issue often leads to airflow disruptions and rough engine operation.
The actuator for the turbocharger, which relies ... More about Volvo XC90 2002 2.4 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.71 m | 4.80 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.80 m | 1.74 m | |
|
Hyundai Terracan is smaller, but higher. Hyundai Terracan is 9 cm shorter than the Volvo XC90, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Hyundai Terracan is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1170 litres | 249 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1955 litres | 2404 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, Hyundai Terracan has 921 litres more trunk space than the Volvo XC90. The Volvo XC90 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volvo XC90 (by 449 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 12.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Hyundai Terracan is 0.9 metres less than that of the Volvo XC90, which means Hyundai Terracan can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`590 | 2`735 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 2600 | 3800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Hyundai Terracan has
|
Volvo XC90 has
| |