Hyundai Terracan 2001 vs Land Rover Range Rover 1994
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.9 Diesel | 2.5 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 333 NM | 270 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.7 seconds | 15.3 seconds | |
|
Hyundai Terracan is more dynamic to drive. Hyundai Terracan engine produces 14 HP more power than Land Rover Range Rover, whereas torque is 63 NM more than Land Rover Range Rover. Thanks to more power Hyundai Terracan reaches 100 km/h speed 1.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.6 | 10.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.6 l/100km | 11.8 l/100km | |
|
The Hyundai Terracan is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Hyundai Terracan consumes 2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover, which means that by driving the Hyundai Terracan over 15,000 km in a year you can save 300 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Hyundai Terracan consumes 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 90 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 870 km in combined cycle | 840 km in combined cycle | |
| 1000 km on highway | 1010 km on highway | ||
| 700 km with real consumption | 760 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 18 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Kia Carnival | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Hyundai Terracan might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.71 m | 4.71 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.80 m | 1.82 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Hyundai Terracan and Land Rover Range Rover are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1170 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1955 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Hyundai Terracan is 0.1 metres less than that of the Land Rover Range Rover. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`590 kg | 3`500 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2600 | 4200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Hyundai Terracan has
|
Land Rover Range Rover has
| |