Hyundai Terracan 2004 vs Jeep Grand Cherokee 2005
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.9 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 163 HP | 218 HP | |
| Torque: | 345 NM | 510 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13 seconds | 9 seconds | |
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee is a more dynamic driving. Hyundai Terracan engine produces 55 HP less power than Jeep Grand Cherokee, whereas torque is 165 NM less than Jeep Grand Cherokee. Due to the lower power, Hyundai Terracan reaches 100 km/h speed 4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.7 | 10.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.3 l/100km | 11.5 l/100km | |
|
The Hyundai Terracan is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Hyundai Terracan consumes 1.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, which means that by driving the Hyundai Terracan over 15,000 km in a year you can save 225 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Hyundai Terracan consumes 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Grand Cherokee. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 78 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 860 km in combined cycle | 760 km in combined cycle | |
| 1010 km on highway | 900 km on highway | ||
| 720 km with real consumption | 670 km with real consumption | ||
| Hyundai Terracan gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 18 years | 5 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Kia Carnival | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Chrysler 300C, Jeep Commander | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Jeep Grand Cherokee 2005 3.0 engine: The main issues with this diesel engine stem from the fuel system and its sensitive piezo injectors. These injectors are known for being highly demanding in terms of fuel quality, which can lead to performance ... More about Jeep Grand Cherokee 2005 3.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.71 m | 4.75 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.87 m | |
| Height: | 1.80 m | 1.74 m | |
|
Hyundai Terracan is smaller, but higher. Hyundai Terracan is 4 cm shorter than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Hyundai Terracan is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1170 litres | 978 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1955 litres | 1909 litres | |
|
Hyundai Terracan has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Hyundai Terracan has 192 litres more trunk space than the Jeep Grand Cherokee. The Jeep Grand Cherokee may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Hyundai Terracan (by 46 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Hyundai Terracan is 0.6 metres more than that of the Jeep Grand Cherokee, which means Hyundai Terracan can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`620 | 2`750 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 3000 | 5600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Hyundai Terracan has
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
| |