Hyundai Terracan 2004 vs Nissan X-Trail 2003
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.9 Diesel | 2.5 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 163 HP | 165 HP | |
| Torque: | 345 NM | 230 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.4 seconds | 11.1 seconds | |
|
Nissan X-Trail is a more dynamic driving. Hyundai Terracan engine produces 2 HP less power than Nissan X-Trail, but torque is 115 NM more than Nissan X-Trail. Due to the lower power, Hyundai Terracan reaches 100 km/h speed 2.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.1 | 9.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.8 l/100km | 11.5 l/100km | |
|
The Hyundai Terracan is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Hyundai Terracan consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan X-Trail, which means that by driving the Hyundai Terracan over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Hyundai Terracan consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan X-Trail. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 820 km in combined cycle | 620 km in combined cycle | |
| 1000 km on highway | 750 km on highway | ||
| 690 km with real consumption | 520 km with real consumption | ||
| Hyundai Terracan gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 18 years | 25 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Kia Carnival | Used also on Nissan Sentra | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan X-Trail might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Hyundai Terracan engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.71 m | 4.51 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.80 m | 1.68 m | |
|
Hyundai Terracan is larger. Hyundai Terracan is 20 cm longer than the Nissan X-Trail, 10 cm wider, while the height of Hyundai Terracan is 12 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1170 litres | 410 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1955 litres | 1841 litres | |
|
Hyundai Terracan has more luggage capacity. Hyundai Terracan has 760 litres more trunk space than the Nissan X-Trail. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Hyundai Terracan (by 114 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Hyundai Terracan is 1.2 metres more than that of the Nissan X-Trail, which means Hyundai Terracan can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`620 | 2`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 3000 | 2600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Hyundai Terracan has
|
Nissan X-Trail has
| |