Hyundai Terracan 2004 vs Mitsubishi Pajero 2003
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.9 - 3.5 | 2.5 - 3.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 163 - 194 HP | 115 - 202 HP | |
| Torque: | 294 - 345 NM | 240 - 450 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.7 - 13.4 seconds | 11.5 - 17.1 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.7 - 15.2 | 9.1 - 13.8 | |
|
Hyundai Terracan petrol engines consumes on average 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mitsubishi Pajero. On average, Hyundai Terracan equipped with diesel engines consume 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Pajero. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.71 m | 4.31 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.80 m | 1.84 m | |
| Hyundai Terracan is 40 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Pajero, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Hyundai Terracan is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1170 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1955 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Hyundai Terracan is 1.2 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Pajero, which means Hyundai Terracan can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`680 | ~ 2`800 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 3000 | 4000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Hyundai Terracan has
|
Mitsubishi Pajero has
| |