Hyundai Santa FE 2004 vs Honda CR-V 2002
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 145 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 204 NM | 190 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.4 seconds | 10 seconds | |
|
Honda CR-V is a more dynamic driving. Hyundai Santa FE engine produces 5 HP less power than Honda CR-V, but torque is 14 NM more than Honda CR-V. Due to the lower power, Hyundai Santa FE reaches 100 km/h speed 1.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.8 | 9.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.1 l/100km | 9.5 l/100km | |
|
The Honda CR-V is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Hyundai Santa FE consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Hyundai Santa FE could require 105 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Hyundai Santa FE consumes 1.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 660 km in combined cycle | 630 km in combined cycle | |
| 830 km on highway | 750 km on highway | ||
| 580 km with real consumption | 610 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 9 years | 10 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Hyundai Sonata, Kia Sorento | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Honda Civic, Honda Accord, Honda FR-V, Honda Stream | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Honda CR-V might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Hyundai Santa FE engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Honda CR-V 2002 2.0 engine: In 2001, Honda introduced the K-series engine lineup, featuring an aluminum block with an open-deck design and cast-iron cylinder liners. It utilizes a port fuel injection system, a 16-valve aluminum cylinder head without hydraulic lifters, individual ignition coils, a VTC cam ... More about Honda CR-V 2002 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.50 m | 4.58 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.73 m | 1.71 m | |
| Hyundai Santa FE is 8 cm shorter than the Honda CR-V, 6 cm wider, while the height of Hyundai Santa FE is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 469 litres | 525 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1473 litres | 952 litres | |
| Hyundai Santa FE has 56 litres less trunk space than the Honda CR-V. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Hyundai Santa FE (by 521 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Hyundai Santa FE is 0.9 metres more than that of the Honda CR-V, which means Hyundai Santa FE can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`380 | 1`910 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | high | |
| Honda CR-V has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Hyundai Santa FE has serious deffects in 50 percent more cases than Honda CR-V, so Honda CR-V quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2800 | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Hyundai Santa FE has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |