Hyundai Santa FE 2004 vs Mitsubishi Outlander 2003
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.4 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 145 HP | 160 HP | |
| Torque: | 204 NM | 213 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.4 seconds | 11.2 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Outlander is a more dynamic driving. Hyundai Santa FE engine produces 15 HP less power than Mitsubishi Outlander, whereas torque is 9 NM less than Mitsubishi Outlander. Due to the lower power, Hyundai Santa FE reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.8 | 10.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.1 l/100km | 10.8 l/100km | |
|
By specification Hyundai Santa FE consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Outlander, which means that by driving the Hyundai Santa FE over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Hyundai Santa FE consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Outlander. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 59 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 660 km in combined cycle | 580 km in combined cycle | |
| 830 km on highway | 730 km on highway | ||
| 580 km with real consumption | 540 km with real consumption | ||
| Hyundai Santa FE gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 9 years | 22 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Hyundai Sonata, Kia Sorento | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Mitsubishi Galant, Mitsubishi Grandis, Mitsubishi Eclipse | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mitsubishi Outlander might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Hyundai Santa FE engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.50 m | 4.54 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.73 m | 1.62 m | |
| Hyundai Santa FE is 4 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Outlander, 9 cm wider, while the height of Hyundai Santa FE is 11 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 469 litres | 402 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1473 litres | 1705 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, Hyundai Santa FE has 67 litres more trunk space than the Mitsubishi Outlander. The Mitsubishi Outlander may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mitsubishi Outlander (by 232 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Hyundai Santa FE is 0.1 metres less than that of the Mitsubishi Outlander. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`380 | 2`070 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2400 | 1800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Hyundai Santa FE has
|
Mitsubishi Outlander has
| |