Hyundai Santa FE 2004 vs BMW X3 2004
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 125 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 285 NM | 330 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13 seconds | 10 seconds | |
|
BMW X3 is a more dynamic driving. Hyundai Santa FE engine produces 25 HP less power than BMW X3, whereas torque is 45 NM less than BMW X3. Due to the lower power, Hyundai Santa FE reaches 100 km/h speed 3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.5 | 7.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.3 l/100km | 8.0 l/100km | |
|
By specification Hyundai Santa FE consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW X3, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Hyundai Santa FE could require 45 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Hyundai Santa FE consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW X3. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 67 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 860 km in combined cycle | 930 km in combined cycle | |
| 1010 km on highway | 1130 km on highway | ||
| 780 km with real consumption | 830 km with real consumption | ||
| BMW X3 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 11 years | 9 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 10 other car models, including Kia Sportage, Kia Ceed, Hyundai Sonata, Hyundai Tucson | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including BMW 3 sērija, BMW 1 sērija | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Hyundai Santa FE might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.50 m | 4.56 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.73 m | 1.67 m | |
|
Hyundai Santa FE is smaller, but higher. Hyundai Santa FE is 6 cm shorter than the BMW X3, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Hyundai Santa FE is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 480 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1560 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Hyundai Santa FE is 0.7 metres less than that of the BMW X3, which means Hyundai Santa FE can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`000 | 2`255 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | average | |
| BMW X3 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Hyundai Santa FE has serious deffects in 35 percent more cases than BMW X3, so BMW X3 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2600 | 4800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Hyundai Santa FE has
|
BMW X3 has
| |